Now, knocking at the door is another person D. Before D knocked on the door, the room is already in a sense filing up with curious atmosphere. Such atmosphere is expressed through A, B and C facials and body behaviors; they all seem to have slight sharpen face, squeezed nose and curled fingers, typical psychosis symptoms. While D enters the room such curious atmosphere immediately strengthens with more emphases on A, B and C psychosis symptoms. D also walk in with slight sharpen face, squeezed nose and curled finger….D comes in to hand over a bundle of document to A and then leave. A, B and C note the curious atmosphere and see how D behaved, but D has not noted any changes in atmosphere; all the sharpen face, squeezed nose and curl fingers to D is absolutely ignorance of what is going on! In another word D sees nothing happen, why he can not feels and sees what A, B and C do have?
Again what is actually going on with this curious scenario? Why D has no awareness at all? In this typical scenario, B and C thought that D has long been gone through the Pan Maturing Process, where as A knew D has still not yet under go the process, as A in few occasions has tested D.
We are now reaching the most difficult area to prove the existing of Pan Maturing Process; the segregation. The segregation of experienced and inexperienced has impressive impacts on the searching of whether a Pan Maturing Process for human being social behaviors existed.
The experienced persons and inexperienced persons are all living in the same environment; the inexperienced persons behave like experienced persons without awareness of their own behavior are the same as those experienced individuals who have gone through the Pan Maturing Process.
This will put the collection of statistic data of Pan Maturing Process into much difficulty. This is because those who have experienced will likely tend to hide themselves by pretending as if they are the inexperienced. If they admitted they have gone through the Process then the terms mental disorder, mental patient and psychosis etc and all the unpleasant wording and descriptions will be flooded to them.
Besides being discriminated, what if the experienced person tells an inexperience person that Pan Maturing Process existed; will the inexperienced individual believe him? Then we come to the question; how does the experienced person be able to justify the experiences he has experienced with his inexperienced peers alike?
To an inexperienced person, we are afraid we are unable to prove this process for him.
The Segregation is mean to create a barrier of understanding for the inexperienced and create a fear for experienced to pretend as an inexperienced person. Hence enhances the Pan Maturing Process to a more impressive feeling of fear on the synchronized phenomenon and its traumatized effect, submissive effect as well as any further effects caused by this synchronized phenomenon relate to the Pan Maturing Process.
Due to the fact that we can not prove to the inexperience regarding the existence of Pan Maturing Process, we therefore have to limit our discussion with the experienced and be the first group of people to do so with acknowledges that such segregation is just a barrier to block the further discovering of truth. Whether this barrier is artificial or natural phenomenon is yet to be discovered.
Further proof at this very moment will be rather difficult; for example exploiting the awareness of synchronized interaction between the experienced persons like A, B and C to prove these interaction existence, will face the random occurrences of the synchronized interactions, as these occurrences are very much occasional rather than consistently; not necessary it will interact when a gathering held at any time, it is rather difficult to predict the onset of this synchronized influence.
Only those experienced persons can sense the onset without much difficulty. The proofs are merely depending on the honesty of these experienced persons, if they refuse to tell the truth, due to the fear on the traumatized effect of synchronized phenomenon, then the statistic of proof will be very much distorted.